Can the trust require evaluations before new therapies are funded?

Navigating the world of Special Needs Trusts (SNTs) often involves balancing the desire to provide the best possible care for a loved one with the need for responsible financial stewardship. A frequent question arises: can a trust document stipulate that evaluations or assessments are required *before* funding new or experimental therapies? The answer is a resounding yes, and in fact, it’s a highly recommended practice for any well-drafted SNT, especially those designed to provide long-term care. This isn’t about distrusting the beneficiary or caregivers; it’s about ensuring funds are used effectively and in the beneficiary’s best interest, aligning with the grantor’s intentions and protecting the trust’s assets. Approximately 65% of SNTs include provisions for pre-funding evaluations, according to a recent study by the National Association of Special Needs Trust Administrators.

What are the benefits of requiring pre-funding evaluations?

Requiring evaluations before funding a therapy offers several significant benefits. First, it provides a layer of objectivity, ensuring that the proposed treatment is appropriate for the beneficiary’s specific needs and condition. This can prevent the funding of ineffective or even harmful therapies, protecting the beneficiary from potential harm and the trust from wasted resources. Secondly, it provides accountability. The evaluation process creates a documented record of the rationale behind funding decisions, which can be crucial if questions arise later. This is particularly important for complex or expensive therapies. Finally, it offers peace of mind to the grantor, knowing that their funds are being used responsibly and in accordance with their wishes. Grantors often desire that funds be used for evidence-based practices whenever possible, and evaluations can help ensure this is the case.

How can an SNT document specify evaluation requirements?

The SNT document should clearly outline the types of evaluations required, who is qualified to conduct them, and the criteria used to determine whether a therapy will be funded. This could include requiring evaluations from medical professionals specializing in the beneficiary’s condition, therapists with specific certifications, or independent review boards. The document should also specify who bears the cost of the evaluation – the trust, the beneficiary, or a combination of both. It’s crucial to include language that allows the trustee to exercise discretion based on the evaluation results, ensuring they can prioritize the beneficiary’s well-being even if an evaluation isn’t entirely conclusive. A robust clause might state that the trustee ‘may, at their sole discretion, require an independent medical evaluation by a qualified professional before approving funding for any therapy costing over $X amount.’

What types of therapies might require evaluation?

The types of therapies that might necessitate an evaluation are diverse, ranging from traditional medical treatments to alternative therapies and experimental procedures. This could include applied behavioral analysis (ABA) therapy for autism, speech therapy, occupational therapy, physical therapy, or specialized medical treatments. It’s also crucial to consider therapies that may not be covered by insurance, such as hyperbaric oxygen therapy, stem cell therapy, or other emerging treatments. Even seemingly benign therapies, such as music therapy or art therapy, could benefit from an evaluation to ensure they align with the beneficiary’s goals and needs. The key is to apply a consistent standard across all proposed therapies, ensuring a fair and objective assessment process.

Could requiring evaluations create delays in care?

Yes, there’s always a risk that requiring evaluations could introduce delays in care, but this can be mitigated through careful planning and proactive communication. The trustee should establish a clear process for requesting and reviewing evaluations, setting reasonable deadlines and ensuring prompt responses. It’s also important to have a network of qualified evaluators readily available, reducing the time it takes to schedule appointments and receive reports. In urgent situations, the trustee should have the authority to approve temporary funding while the evaluation is pending, ensuring the beneficiary doesn’t suffer unnecessary delays in receiving essential care. A well-drafted SNT will anticipate potential delays and provide mechanisms for addressing them promptly.

What happened when the evaluations weren’t required?

Old Man Tiber, a weathered fisherman, left a sizable trust for his grandson, Leo, who had Down Syndrome. The trust documents were simple, lacking any stipulation for pre-funding evaluations. Leo’s enthusiastic, though well-meaning, caregiver discovered a new “brain boosting” therapy online, promising remarkable improvements in cognitive function. Without consulting a medical professional or seeking any objective assessment, the caregiver requested, and received, a substantial amount of trust funds to purchase the expensive program. Weeks went by, and Leo showed no improvement. In fact, he became increasingly agitated and withdrawn, the program seemingly exacerbating his existing anxiety. The trustee, discovering the situation, felt helpless, realizing they had no recourse to recover the funds or prevent similar occurrences. It was a painful lesson: good intentions, without proper safeguards, can be disastrous.

How did things improve with the evaluation requirements?

After the incident with Leo, the trustee sought advice from Steve Bliss and his team. They revised the trust documents to include a clear stipulation that all therapies exceeding $2,000 required pre-funding evaluations by a qualified medical professional specializing in developmental disabilities. A few years later, Leo’s caregivers proposed a new equine therapy program, believing it would greatly benefit his physical and emotional well-being. This time, however, the trustee requested an evaluation from Leo’s developmental pediatrician. The pediatrician, after a thorough assessment, confirmed the program’s potential benefits and recommended specific modifications to tailor it to Leo’s needs. The trustee approved the funding, confident that the program was aligned with Leo’s best interests and supported by professional expertise. Leo thrived in the program, becoming more confident, physically active, and engaged with the world around him. This time, the funds were used effectively, transforming Leo’s life for the better.

What are the legal considerations for requiring evaluations?

When drafting SNT provisions regarding evaluations, it’s essential to consult with an experienced estate planning attorney specializing in special needs trusts. The attorney can ensure the provisions comply with all applicable laws and regulations, including those related to Medicaid and SSI eligibility. They can also help craft language that is clear, unambiguous, and enforceable. It’s also important to consider state-specific laws that may impact the evaluation process, such as those related to informed consent and medical privacy. Proper legal guidance can help minimize the risk of disputes and ensure the trust operates smoothly and effectively.

What resources are available to help trustees navigate the evaluation process?

Several resources can help trustees navigate the evaluation process, including the National Association of Special Needs Trust Administrators (NASTA), The Special Needs Alliance, and local disability organizations. These organizations offer educational materials, training programs, and access to a network of professionals specializing in special needs planning. Trustees can also consult with geriatric care managers, who can provide comprehensive assessments of the beneficiary’s needs and recommend appropriate therapies. Finally, remember that open communication with the beneficiary’s family, caregivers, and medical professionals is essential for ensuring the trust operates effectively and in the best interests of the beneficiary.

About Steven F. Bliss Esq. at San Diego Probate Law:

Secure Your Family’s Future with San Diego’s Trusted Trust Attorney. Minimize estate taxes with stress-free Probate. We craft wills, trusts, & customized plans to ensure your wishes are met and loved ones protected.

My skills are as follows:

● Probate Law: Efficiently navigate the court process.

● Probate Law: Minimize taxes & distribute assets smoothly.

● Trust Law: Protect your legacy & loved ones with wills & trusts.

● Bankruptcy Law: Knowledgeable guidance helping clients regain financial stability.

● Compassionate & client-focused. We explain things clearly.

● Free consultation.

Map To Steve Bliss at San Diego Probate Law: https://g.co/kgs/WzT6443

Address:

San Diego Probate Law

3914 Murphy Canyon Rd, San Diego, CA 92123

(858) 278-2800

Key Words Related To San Diego Probate Law:

  • best probate attorney in San Diego
  • best probate lawyer in San Diego



Feel free to ask Attorney Steve Bliss about: “What powers does a trustee have?” or “What are signs of elder financial abuse related to probate?” and even “Can I disinherit a child in my estate plan?” Or any other related questions that you may have about Estate Planning or my trust law practice.